UNIFIL finally gets to do its' job?

-
Security Council Resolution 1701 section 12:
Acting in support of a request from the government of Lebanon to deploy an international force to assist it to exercise its authority throughout the territory, authorizes Unifil to take all necessary action in areas of deployment of its forces and as it deems within its capabilities, to ensure that its area of operations is not utilised for hostile activities of any kind, to resist attempts by forceful means to prevent it from discharging its duties under the mandate of the Security Council, and to protect United Nations personnel, facilities, installations and equipment, ensure the security and freedom of movement of United Nations personnel, humanitarian workers, and, without prejudice to the responsibility of the government of Lebanon, to protect civilians under imminent threat of physical violence;
What a pity it has taken several invasions of Lebanon to get these words which most people probably thought a UN force would have had before. Now to see (a) if they mean it and (b) which countries will provide the 15,000 troops.

Note to the UN - (a) does not mean "promise protection but deliver ineffectual rules of engagement and insufficient manpower and equipment". Another Srebrenica or Rwanda will be the sunset of UN peacekeeping.

Section 8 subpoint 6 is pretty important too:
Provision to the United Nations of all remaining maps of land mines in Lebanon in Israel's possession;
Update: I may have spoken too soon - the magic words "Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter" are missing, reflecting a Hezbollah veto. This would have empowered UNIFIL to have a peace-enforcement role. Even an intention to enter a future Chapter VII resolution (section 10 of the US-French Draft Resolution) has been excised and disarmament of Hezbollah is reserved to the Lebanese Government. Essentially UNIFIL will act as bodyguard to UN personnel and as aid to the Lebanese civil and military power if requested.

The danger remains the same as after the 2000 agreement - that the Lebanese State remains too weak to do what the international community expects of it, because of lack of resource but also because of the presence of Hezbollah representation within the executive.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Your request could not be completed. Please try again in a few minutes."

-
When setting automatic replies (Out of Office) via Exchange 2013 OWA on behalf of another user, the message in the title can be displayed when saving the text. If you look at the System Event Log on the Exchange Server, you may see the following event ID 4: Current user: '" (domain)/(OU)/(OU)/(administrator) " on behalf of " (domain)/(OU)/(OU)/(User) "' Request for URL ( long URL follows ) failed with the following error: Microsoft.Exchange.Management.ControlPanel.RegionalSettingsNotConfiguredException: We couldn't process the request because the user ' (domain)/(OU)/(OU)/(User) ' hasn't signed in to Outlook Web App and selected a language and a time zone. Ask the user to do this, or, if you are a member of the built-in Organization Management or Help Desk role group, you can use Window PowerShell to select a language and time zone for them. Cancel the Automatic Replies dialog and switch to Settings, which will display a Time Zone selecti
Read more

Chirac gets it right on Lebanon troops?

-
When you have bloggers such as Far and Wide's Steve V and Sicilian Notes' Richard Waghorne , the former a raging critic of Israeli operations in Lebanon and the latter a largely uncritical supporter, agreeing on something you can't help feeling like the unlikely has happened - France is doing something right. They have both criticised France's reluctance to increase UNIFIL troop numbers beyond a fairly token 400, up from their current commitment of 200. France's reluctance is mirrored by the Germans who have offered naval anti-smuggling patrols and perhaps border security, the UK and Denmark who have also offered ships, the Italians who are ready to send 3,000 but not yet and the Irish who have earmarked 200 (which would bring them up to the legal maximum of about 850 overseas at any time due to the Liberia mission) but who are also holding back . The reason is that which I posted on some days ago (albeit having taken a second swing at it) - Resolution 1701 does
Read more

Remote Desktop Connection Manager - a boon for admins

-
I subscribe to a bunch of Microsoft blogs and one of them revealed a gem in the past month.  RDCMan, a tool which allows an admin to group together remote desktops, preset their username/password combos and connect to those groups with a right-click option, has been invaluable in my work lately which involves quickly jumping from server to server or from servers to a group of workstations.  The gorgeous thing about it is not merely a gallery of thumbnails of the connected sessions, but the ability to interact with the thumbnails with sufficiently accurate mouse clicks.  Heartily recommended. Here's the original post: Introducing Remote Desktop Connection Manager 2.2 (You had me at EHLO - the Microsoft Exchange Team blog)
Read more